Information Processes & Technology — NSW HSC scaling 2024

UAC's verbatim 2024 scaling for Information Processes & Technology. 1,715 students sat this course. Median scaled mark 23.9; top-decile (P90) scaled 38.3; cohort scaled mean 23.6 (out of 50 per unit).

Scaled marks distribution

Percentile	HSC mark	Scaled mark
P99 (top 1%)	47.0	44.8
P90 (top 10%)	44.0	38.3
P75 (top 25%)	40.5	32.7
P50 (median)	37.0	23.9
P25 (bottom 25%)	32.5	14.8

Summary statistics

	HSC mark (raw)	Scaled mark
Mean	36.1	23.6
Standard deviation	6.5	11.2
Maximum	48.5	49.8
Students (2024)	1,715

How Information Processes & Technology scaled in 2024

This subject scales down. The average student in this course performs below the senior-secondary cohort median across all their subjects, so scaling adjusts most raw marks downward. Important nuance: this does not mean strong students in this subject get poor scaled marks — look at the P90 row in the table. Top performers are still rewarded; the cohort-average position is what moves the mean.

For Information Processes & Technology specifically, the scaled distribution runs from P25 of 14.8 to P90 of 38.3 — a spread of 23.5 scaled points between the bottom and top quartiles of the cohort. That spread is the practical room for movement within this subject: a student who moves from the bottom quartile of Information Processes & Technology to the top decile gains roughly 23 scaled points per unit, which is significant when multiplied across 2 units toward the ATAR aggregate.

The gap between HSC mark and scaled mark at P90 was -5.7. That gap is negative — top-performing Information Processes & Technology students were scaled down in 2024. This is what scaling actually does: it's not a percentage multiplier; it's a candidature-position adjustment.

Tutor rate context for Information Processes & Technology

Subject complexity classification: medium. Based on our subject-complexity model, this subject typically carries a no uplift adjustment to the base AU tutor rate band — partly because of the qualified-tutor pool size, partly because of subject-specific marking and exam complexity.

Tutor tier	Typical rate for Information Processes & Technology
University-student tutor	$60/hr
Experienced graduate	$80/hr
Registered teacher	$110/hr
Subject specialist	$140/hr

Estimates from the AU rate synthesis at /rates/. Use the rate estimator to add city and delivery format.

How to read the distribution

The HSC mark column shows the raw HSC mark you would have needed to sit at each percentile of the Information Processes & Technology candidature in 2024. The scaled mark column shows what that performance was worth toward your ATAR aggregate. The two values diverge because scaling reflects the academic strength of the candidature as a whole — it is not a fixed conversion of raw HSC mark to scaled mark.

The same HSC mark can produce a range of scaled marks (because students with that HSC mark may have different positions in the underlying cohort). This is why UAC publishes a distribution rather than a lookup table.

Caveats specific to Information Processes & Technology

• This is 2024 data. UAC recomputes scaling each year — 2025 figures will move if the candidature mix changes.
• The HSC mark on your transcript is the NESA-reported HSC mark (aligned to course standards). The mark used in scaling is the raw HSC mark, which is not reported to students directly.
• For courses with combined candidatures (English Standard / Advanced / Studies share a common scale via the NESA standards-aligned raw marks), UAC's scaling treats the combined group; per-course reporting is for transparency.
• Use the scaling data to understand the system, not as the only input to subject selection. Subject engagement matters more than scaling pattern at every level except perhaps the very top decile.

Related resources