ATAR scaling, decoded.
Verbatim official scaling data from UAC, VTAC, QTAC, TISC, and SATAC — plus the only AU calculator that uses the actual published means and standard deviations. No estimates, no guessing.
Scaling calculator
Plug in your subjects and study scores. Get an estimated scaled aggregate and ATAR using the official figures.
UAC scaling — NSW HSC
Mean, SD, and percentile-by-percentile scaling for every HSC course with 40+ students.
VTAC scaling — VCE
Scaled study scores at 20/25/30/35/40/45/50 for ~80 VCE subjects + VCE VET.
QTAC scaling — QCE
Raw-to-scaled percentile mapping for every General + Applied QCE subject.
TISC scaling — WACE
What WACE actually reports + Maths Methods/Specialist 10% bonus math.
SATAC — SACE / NTCET
Aggregate-to-ATAR conversion and how SA differs from the rest.
What is ATAR scaling, actually?
The ATAR is a rank, not a mark. It tells universities the percentile position of a student in their Year-12 cohort. To produce a fair rank when students take different subjects, each state's tertiary admissions centre (TAC) scales raw subject marks so a strong performance in a hard subject counts more than a strong performance in an easier subject.
"Hard" here doesn't mean conceptually difficult — it means the candidature is academically strong. If most students who pick a subject are already high-achieving across all their courses, that subject's marks get scaled up. If most students who pick it underperform across their other courses, that subject's marks get scaled down. The mechanism is the same in every state. The reporting format differs.
Scaling is recalculated every year. Last year's pattern is not a guarantee for this year's. UAC says it explicitly: "if the quality of the candidature changes, the scaled mean will also change." Use prior-year data as a guide, not a promise.
The five-state landscape
| State | Senior cert | Curriculum body | Admissions centre | 2024 ATAR recipients | Per-subject detail published? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | HSC | NESA | UAC | 57,194 | Full — mean, SD, max, P25–P99 for raw + scaled |
| VIC | VCE | VCAA | VTAC | — | Full — scaled mean, SD, scores at 20/25/30/35/40/45/50 |
| QLD | QCE | QCAA | QTAC | 28,845 | Full — raw & scaled at P25/P50/P75/P90/P99 |
| WA | WACE | SCSA | TISC | 9,992 | Summary only (course-level Maths means; no per-subject detail published by TISC) |
| SA / NT | SACE / NTCET | SACE Board | SATAC | — | Aggregate-to-ATAR table only (no per-subject scaling published by SATAC) |
Sources: official tertiary admissions centre reports, 2024 cohort.
The 2024 top-scaling subjects (cross-state)
"Scaled mean" is the score the average student in a course received after scaling. A high scaled mean means the subject's candidature was strong; a low scaled mean does not mean the subject is "easier" — it usually means the candidature is more mixed. Note that the three states publish on different bases (NSW uses 50 max, VIC scales to 50 max, QLD uses 100 max), so the numbers below are not directly comparable across states.
VIC VCE top 5 (scaled mean / 50)
| Subject | Scaled mean | Scaled SD |
|---|---|---|
| Latin | 45.0 | 6.3 |
| Specialist Mathematics | 41.6 | 8.3 |
| Chinese Second Language | 40.6 | 6.5 |
| Hebrew | 40.5 | 6.9 |
| French | 40.1 | 6.5 |
NSW HSC top 5 by scaled mean (/ 50)
| Course | Scaled mean | P90 scaled | P50 scaled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics Extension 2 | 43.4 | 47.9 | 44.7 |
| Mathematics Extension 1 | 39.6 | 46.9 | 41.3 |
| English Extension 1 | 36.2 | 43.3 | 36.9 |
| English Extension 2 | 35.8 | 44.4 | 36.0 |
| Music Extension | 35.8 | 49.4 | 35.8 |
QLD QCE top 5 by scaled median (/ 100)
| Subject | Scaled P50 | Scaled P90 |
|---|---|---|
| Specialist Mathematics | 95.35 | 98.4 |
| French | 94.73 | 98.19 |
| German | 93.46 | 97.41 |
| English and Literature Extension | 91.49 | 95.5 |
| Chemistry | 90.45 | 96.83 |
The 2024 lowest-scaling subjects (VIC, by scaled mean)
These subjects scaled down in 2024 — the average study score of 30 mapped to a scaled score significantly below 30 in the VTAC aggregation process. Important context: a lower scaled mean doesn't make the subject the "wrong" choice. It usually reflects a wide candidature that includes both very strong and very weak students. Pick subjects you will engage with; do not pick on scaling alone.
| Subject | Scaled mean | Study score 30 → scaled |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation Mathematics | 21.3 | 20 |
| Industry and Enterprise | 22.1 | 21 |
| Food Studies | 24.1 | 23 |
| Agricultural & Horticultural Studies | 24.7 | 24 |
| Product Design and Technologies | 25.4 | 24 |
Every year a wave of articles tells you to "pick high-scaling subjects" as if scaling is a rigged game you can win. It is not. A student who hates Specialist Maths and grits through it to a study score of 25 will get a worse scaled score than the same student getting 35 in a subject they enjoy. The scaling boost on Specialist Maths only kicks in for students who are actually performing at the upper end of its candidature.
Use scaling data to understand the system, not to game it.
- UAC — Report on the Scaling of the 2024 NSW HSC (PDF)
- VTAC — 2024 Scaling Report (PDF)
- QTAC — ATAR Report 2024 (PDF)
- TISC — 2024 Scaling and ATAR Information (PDF)
- SATAC — 2024 SACE/NTCET aggregate to ATAR (PDF)